You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/07 |
Linda Lee Corbin (4:05-bk-06707-JMM) 04/26/07 Memorandum Decision re: Confirmation |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 10/09/09 |
Dsbc Investments, L.L.C. (4:09-bk-03146-JMM) 10/09/09 Memorandum Decision re: Motion for Reconsideration |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 10/03/05 |
Ball V. Kma Associates, L.L.C. An Arizona Limited Liabilit (4:05-ap-00118-JMM) 10/03/05 Memorandum Decision re: KMA Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 08/25/08 |
Michael Dean Richardson (4:07-bk-01773-JMM) 08/25/08 Memorandum Decision re: Administrative Rent Claim |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 06/26/08 |
Balraj Singh Takhar (2:04-bk-17439-JMM) 06/26/08 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 05/16/07 |
Bci Bebout Concrete, Inc. V. Turner Dunn Homes, Inc. Et Al (4:06-ap-00106-JMM) 05/16/07 Memorandum Decision re: Summary Judgment (Partial) Involving Lien Claimant |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 08/16/05 |
Elizabeth J Blackwell (4:05-bk-02534-JMM) 08/16/05 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 11/06/12 |
Derusha Et Al V. Duncan Et Al (2:12-ap-00068-JMM) 11/06/12 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 10/16/12 |
Poland (4:12-bk-18417-JMM) 10/16/12 Holding: Judicial liens (as a result of a recorded judgment) only attach to real property. ARIZ. REV. STAT. §§ 33-961; 33-964. Recorded judgments have no legal effect on personalty owned by a debtor. Thus, neither of the recorded judgments has created judicial liens against the Debtors' personal property. And, since the Debtors own no real property, the "avoiding" of those judicial liens is unnecessary. Thus, unless the Debtors have legal authority that a lien has been created, by operation of Arizona law, upon their personal property (this court is not aware of any such statute), it would appear that the motions are moot. This court cannot grant the relief sought, because no wrong has been done to the Debtors which needs to be undone. |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 01/24/07 |
Dale Elliott Newton And Marcella Teresa Newton (4:06-bk-00362-JMM) 01/24/07 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) |