You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/21/10 |
Peter Tescione, Jr (4:09-bk-05569-EWH) 12/21/10 Memorandum Overruling Debtor's Objection to Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Withdraw |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 12/22/08 |
Peterson V. Polsky Et Al (4:08-ap-00393-EWH) 12/22/08 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 04/24/12 |
West Speedway Phase Ii, Llc (4:09-bk-15664-EWH) 04/24/12 Memorandum Decision Regarding Natural Gas Improvement |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 05/11/07 |
Joseph S Cunningham (4:06-bk-01385-EWH) 05/11/07 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 06/15/12 |
Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company V. Intergalectic Properties, Llc Et Al (4:11-ap-01312-EWH) 06/15/12 Amended Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law as to Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 06/23/14 |
Arizona Auto Spa 4, LLC v. Spreiser (4:12-ap-01988-EWH) 06/23/14 Holding: Debtor and his marital community cannot discharge the following obligations: $20,000 due to Ross, $20,000 due to Sheftel and $25,000 due to AAS4. |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 08/12/04 |
Francisco J Espinosa (4:92-bk-03819-EWH) 08/12/04 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 09/05/12 |
Mark Bond And Ashlea Bond (4:11-bk-33849-EWH) 09/05/12 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 03/07/11 |
Extra Room, Inc. (4:09-bk-03694-EWH) 03/07/11 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 06/14/13 |
Val-Mid Associates, L.L.C (4:12-bk-20519-EWH) 06/14/13 Holding: The Amended Plan does not satisfy § 1129’s confirmation requirements. Dismissal of the case is not in the best interest of creditors. Appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee is not economically feasible. Accordingly, the case is converted to Chapter 7. |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) |