You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/19 |
Puchi Properties Inc (4:14-bk-01372-BMW) 05/09/19 Partial Ruling and ORDER Regarding: Motion to Enforce Order Confirming Plan of Reorganization and for Order Compelling UETA of Arizona, Inc. to Comply with the Terms of Trustee's Plan of Reorganization |
Chief Judge Brenda Moody Whinery | |
| 07/01/14 |
Nasch v. Laos (4:13-ap-00037-BMW) 07/01/14 Holding: Plaintiffs failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they are entitled to the relief requested in their Complaint for denial of the Debtors’ discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (4) and (6). |
Chief Judge Brenda Moody Whinery | |
| 01/15/20 |
Farwest Pump Company (4:17-bk-11112-BMW) 01/15/20 Ruling and ORDER Regarding Committee's Emergency Motion to Toll Deadline to File Complaint for Fraudulent Transfers and/or Preference Payments |
Chief Judge Brenda Moody Whinery | |
| 07/08/13 |
Blanco et al v. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of Arizona (4:11-ap-01812-EWH) 07/08/13 Holding: The fees which Debtors seek to collect are related to the substance of a pending Appeal. Because the outcome of the Appeal may alter the Court’s prior ruling, the Court finds that it has been divested of jurisdiction to proceed with implementation of only a portion of the Memorandum. Even if it were possible to partially implement the Memorandum, judicial economy would not be served by having only one part of the Memorandum reduced to judgment. If Debtors succeed on the Appeal, the Court will then have to determine the amount of their actual and punitive damages, as well as their claim for additional attorneys’ fees incurred in the Appeal. Such a piecemeal, time-consuming process is not cost effective for the Court or the parties. |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 03/12/09 |
Luis J. Lopez And Natalie I. Lopez (4:08-bk-11703-EWH) 03/12/09 Opinion |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 09/13/07 |
David E Deeds (2:06-bk-03855-EWH) 09/13/07 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 12/21/10 |
Peter Tescione, Jr (4:09-bk-05569-EWH) 12/21/10 Memorandum Denying Motion to Include Power of Attorney in Future Hearings |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 11/16/09 |
Christopher George Gietl And Jennifer Faye Gietl (4:09-bk-08828-EWH) 11/16/09 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 01/16/13 |
Jennifer Michele Harwood (4:11-bk-34126-EWH) 01/16/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 05/23/05 |
Edward Easters Clark Iii And Gertrude Helene Clark (0:05-bk-00104-EWH) 05/23/05 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) |