You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date | Description | Judge | |
---|---|---|---|
03/24/10 |
Hille V. Hille (2:08-ap-00485-CGC) 03/24/10 Under Advisement Decision re: Dischargeability of Debt |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
03/24/09 |
Birdsell V. May Et Al (2:08-ap-00112-CGC) 03/24/09 Under Advisement Decision Re: Turnover |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
06/25/08 |
Remediation Financial, Inc. Et Al V. Steadfast Santa Clarita Holdings Llc Et Al (2:07-ap-00520-CGC) 06/25/08 Under Advisement Decision re: Motions for Summary |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
04/14/06 |
Tpg Of Scottsdale, Llc V. Bruno Et Al (2:06-ap-00003-CGC) 04/14/06 Under Advisement Decision re: Motion to Quash Lis Pendens |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
03/31/11 |
Spectrum Town Center Property, Llc (2:09-bk-13764-CGC) 03/31/11 Memorandum Decision re: Confirmation of Second Amended Plan of Reorganization |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
03/24/10 |
April V. Walther (2:09-ap-00003-CGC) 03/24/10 Under Advisement Decision re: Dischargeability |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
03/01/07 |
Covenant Christian Center Int. (2:06-bk-02386-CGC) 03/01/07 Under Advisement Decision re: New Hopes' Motion to Lift Stay |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
06/22/05 |
James Alexander Mulvihill And Teresa Kay Mulvihill (2:05-bk-02070-CGC) 06/22/05 Under Advisement Decision re: Objection to Exemptions |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
02/02/06 |
Stanley V. Mackenzie Et Al (2:04-ap-00817-CGC) 02/02/06 Under Advisement Decision re: Trial |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
09/21/12 |
Red Mountain Machinery Company v. Comerica Bank (2:09-ap-00941-CGC) 09/21/12 Holding: Dierich’s activities fall short of what they should have been and the Court has found that some of those activities breached his fiduciary duty to RMMC. Indeed, in the many ways, the facts are so egregious that ever recurring questions are -- can’t something be done about this? Isn’t there some remedy for what he did? How can it be right for him to "get a pass?" But the law requires more than bad acts. It insists that those bad acts be the cause of concrete damage to the plaintiff. And, in this case, the proof is just not there on this critical point, except to the extent Dierich was paid during 2009 by RMMC while at the same time acting in his own interests. For these reasons, judgment will be given to the Defendants on all claims other than for salary disgorgement during 2009. |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) |