You are here


Email Updates - Click here to subscribe for automatic notices when this page is updated.

The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.

Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.

Date Description Judgesort descending
02/07/18 Va Bene Trist, Llc (2:17-bk-00993-DPC) 02/07/18

ORDER Denying Debtor's Motion to Amend or Alter Under Advisement Ruling

Judge Daniel P. Collins
09/08/20 Ig Holdings, Inc. V. Soderquist (3:19-ap-00376-DPC) 09/08/20


Judge Daniel P. Collins
06/06/13 Strata Title, Llc (2:12-bk-24242-DPC) 06/06/13

Under Advisement Decision Determining: 1) Membership Interests are no Longer Estate Property and 2) Order Lifting the Section 362(a) Stay is Lifted

Judge Daniel P. Collins
04/01/21 Wollner V. Spanish Hills Condominium Association (2:20-ap-00195-DPC) 04/01/21

ORDER Granting Motion to Declare Robert Wollner a Vexatious Litigant

Judge Daniel P. Collins
07/25/14 Smith v. Leverton (2:13-ap-00232-DPC) 07/25/14

Holding: Denying both Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for reconsideration.

Judge Daniel P. Collins
01/31/22 Ryan Michael Mayer (2:21-bk-06572-DPC) 01/31/22

UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING Re Motion to Dismiss Debtor's Case Per 11 U.S.C. Secs. 1307(c) and 105(a)

Judge Daniel P. Collins
03/15/19 Morris Anderson & Associates, Ltd. V. Redeye Ii, L.L.C. Et Al (2:14-ap-00534-DPC) 03/15/19


Judge Daniel P. Collins
03/31/16 Edwards v. US Dept of Education et al (3:15-ap-00026-PS) 03/31/16

Under Advisement Order

Judge Daniel P. Collins
07/15/13 Sample (2:10-bk-38373-DPC) 07/15/13

Holding: So long as there is not a contrary published opinion from the District Court of Arizona, this Court will follow the opinions of the Ninth Circuit BAP, whether or not this Court agrees with the reasoning behind the particular BAP decision. The BAP in the Friedman decision held that the absolute priority rule does not apply in an individual debtor’s Chapter 11 case. The rationale for its 2-1 decision is set out in the extensive opinion penned in Friedman by Bankruptcy Judge Clarkson. Although this Court tends to favor the dissenting decision of Judge Jury in Friedman, for the reasons stated above, this Court feels duty bound to follow the majority’s holding in Friedman. Accordingly, the objection to the Debtor’s chapter 11 plan based on absolute priority grounds is hereby overruled.

Judge Daniel P. Collins
03/14/17 Richard John Zivney, III (3:16-bk-07582-DPC) 03/14/17

Amended Under Advisement Ruling on Debtor's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Sustaining Trustee's Objection to Claimed Exemption

Judge Daniel P. Collins