You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/19 |
Lavelle Curtis Scott, JR. (2:19-bk-11722-DPC) 10/03/19 ORDER Denying Motion to Amend Petition |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 11/25/14 |
Sam Rei, L.L.C. v. Continental Group, LLC et al (2:14-ap-00319-DPC) 11/25/14 Holding: Harris immunity extends to Ellett Law Offices and Ellett’s conduct while it was Chapter 11 counsel for Debtor. The same public policy considerations favoring immunity for trustees and court appointed attorneys in a Chapter 7 case also favor such immunity in a Chapter 11 case. As to Continental’s Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs have standing to pursue their equitable subordination claims and Continental’s Motion is denied. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 09/30/20 |
Parker V. Titan Mining (Us) Corporation Et Al (2:19-ap-00412-DPC) 09/30/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 01/24/14 |
Scannell v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al (2:13-ap-00302-DPC) 01/24/14 Holding: The parties present an issue of first impression, namely, which has priority in Arizona: a restitution lien or a purchase money deed of trust? The Court concludes that a purchase money deed of trust against real property has priority over an earlier recorded restitution lien. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 07/21/23 |
TIMOTHY R GEIGER (2:17-bk-14599-DPC) 07/21/23 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEBTOR |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 11/16/16 |
Cruz v. Schmidt et al (2:14-ap-00018-DPC) 11/16/16 Under Advisement Decision Determining Dischargeability of Debt |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/02/13 |
Two Brothers XI, Inc. et al (2:10-bk-23048-DPC) 05/02/13 Holding: Enterprise contends it is entitled to superpriority administrative expense claims because the adequate protection provided to it by the Debtors was insufficient to cover the actual decrease in the value of its collateral. Because Enterprise has not proven that its collateral decreased in value, the Court denies Enterprise’s Superpriority Application. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 10/25/19 |
Shaffer v. Amazon Services LLC (2:13-ap-00799-DPC) 10/25/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Regarding Discovery Disputes |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 06/12/17 |
Karen Choy Lan Yee (2:16-bk-11798-DPC) 06/12/17 ORDER Regarding Fees and Expenses Sought to Be Held Nondischargeable Under 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(5) |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 03/06/20 |
Kara Frances Jennings (2:18-bk-11759-DPC) 03/06/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING on Trustee's Motion for Reconsideration |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |