You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date | Description | Judge | |
---|---|---|---|
11/16/16 |
Cruz v. Schmidt et al (2:14-ap-00018-DPC) 11/16/16 Under Advisement Decision Determining Dischargeability of Debt |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
05/02/13 |
Two Brothers XI, Inc. et al (2:10-bk-23048-DPC) 05/02/13 Holding: Enterprise contends it is entitled to superpriority administrative expense claims because the adequate protection provided to it by the Debtors was insufficient to cover the actual decrease in the value of its collateral. Because Enterprise has not proven that its collateral decreased in value, the Court denies Enterprise’s Superpriority Application. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
09/14/20 |
Gina M. Cooke (3:18-bk-10014-DPC) 09/14/20 ORDER Re: Application for Attorneys' Fees |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
06/12/17 |
Karen Choy Lan Yee (2:16-bk-11798-DPC) 06/12/17 ORDER Regarding Fees and Expenses Sought to Be Held Nondischargeable Under 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(5) |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
02/11/19 |
Morris Anderson & Associates, Ltd. V. Redeye Ii, L.L.C. Et Al (2:14-ap-00534-DPC) 02/11/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Re Motion in Limine No. 2 (Alter Ego/Piercing the Veil) |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
05/26/23 |
Win Big Development, LLC (2:20-bk-07495-DPC) 05/26/23 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE MECHANIC'S LIEN |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
10/03/19 |
Lavelle Curtis Scott, JR. (2:19-bk-11722-DPC) 10/03/19 ORDER Denying Motion to Amend Petition |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
09/04/15 |
Gun Bo, LLC v. Cork (2:12-ap-01675-DPC) 09/04/15 ORDER Denying Debtor's Discharge |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
04/25/13 |
Strata Title LLC (2:12-bk-24242-DPC) 04/25/13 Holding: The Operating Agreement is an executory contract, the purchase option within the Operating Agreement was triggered by an unenforceable ipso facto clause, and a valid trigger of the purchase option would nevertheless require stay relief, which relief is not presently warranted. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
09/30/20 |
Parker V. Titan Mining (Us) Corporation Et Al (2:19-ap-00412-DPC) 09/30/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |