You are here

Opinions

Email Updates - Click here to subscribe for automatic notices when this page is updated.

The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.

Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.

Date Description Judgesort ascending
07/25/08 Kimberly Ann Kent And Gregg Terry Kent (2:07-bk-03238-SSC) 07/25/08

Memorandum Decision Denying Stay Pending Appeal

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
01/11/06 Karen Y Mccarrell (2:06-bk-00004-SSC) 01/11/06

Order Denying Debtor's Emergency Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(C)(3) to Continue Stay Relief

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
06/30/11 Sedona Stars, Llc (2:09-bk-31481-SSC) 06/30/11

Stipulated Findings of Fact and Order Concerning Settlement of Chapter 11 Case

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
09/27/04 Jeffrey R. Smith And Christie M. Smith (2:04-bk-03244-SSC) 09/27/04

Memorandum Decision

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
12/15/11 94Th And Shea, L.L.C. (2:10-bk-37387-SSC) 12/15/11

Memorandum Decision

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
03/31/06 Gti Capital Holdings Llc (2:03-bk-07923-SSC) 03/31/06

Memorandum Decision on Third and Fourth Fee Applications of Bryan Cave

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
01/30/13 James Gray Bennitt, Jr. And Kelley Lea Bennitt (2:11-bk-04053-SSC) 01/30/13

Memorandum Decision Holding Debtors James And Kelley Bennitt in Contempt for Failure to Comply with Consent Order

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
09/18/06 Romo V. Marsh Et Al (2:05-ap-00985-SSC) 09/18/06

Memorandum Decision

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
12/28/12 Timothy Ray Wright (2:09-bk-32244-SSC) 12/28/12

Holding: The parties seek a determination on the existence of a deficiency claim. It is the Court’s belief that resolution of “all claims” in the settlement of the Adversary Proceeding encompassed said deficiency claim. This settlement between the Debtor and MidFirst resulted in a final agreed order that required the dismissal of the Adversary Proceeding with prejudice. MidFirst’s attempt to resurrect this claim, without a specific reservation in the final order dismissing the Adversary Proceeding, months after the settlement, and more than a year after the sale of the Properties, is without a legal basis.

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)
11/18/04 Gti Capital Holdings Llc (2:03-bk-07923-SSC) 11/18/04

Memorandum Decision Granting in Part, and Denying in Part, Motion to Disqualify Bryan Cave LLP

Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired)

Pages